Exploring interesting Gospels are not the gospel of Mark and Q. The most interesting is the Aramaic

I think St. Matthew probably wrote his Gospel in Aramaic, about 38 m., If not before. The fact that the original version of the Gospel of Matthew was in Aramaic, is obvious. At least it was believed from the second century. and later.
Today, however, most of the "experts" will tell you that the above was written in the Gospel of Mark, and wrote the first Christian community. They are my reason that the Gospel of Mark is short, to the lack of Christ's teaching episodes, and it seems that spent a full retelling of the resurrection.
Therefore, like the "experts" say that there was another, now lost document, frey wille the name of which is unknown, and so it is arbitrarily called "Q" (abbreviation of the German word Quelle, meaning "source"). Q This document was Christ speaking set. Later, Matthew and Luke allegedly took the Gospel of Mark and Q, joined them and wrote their gospels, which has a lot of Mark, but with each one different from the other. Therefore, these "experts" believe in the priority of Mark, or the fact that the Gospel of Mark was written first.
All the early Christian documents that talk about the Gospels, suggests that St. Matthew's Gospel is the first. These authors have been closer to the apostolic tradition of the witnesses than we are.
All the early Christian documents speak on the subject, suggests that the original St. Matthew's frey wille Gospel was written in Aramaic - the language of the Jews, but not in Greek - the language of the Gentiles. What is so meaning to write the Gospel frey wille in Aramaic after the Gospel written in Greek? Why should the Gentiles, in any way concern the Aramaic Gospel? Rather, the Gospel of Matthew was written in Aramaic, because it was the first gospel written by a Jew to the Jews.
In all four Gospels, frey wille Matthew's Gospel is the most aramėjizmų. That is, it is arranged by a Jewish grammar and there are even references to the Aramaic words. Matthew 16.18 ("You are Peter") is perhaps the most obvious.
Who was St. Matthew? frey wille He was a tax collector. What makes the tax collectors? Tax collectors are distinguished by the use of feathers, ink and parchment recording. So if Christ had twelve apostles, most of whom were fishermen, and one - the tax collector, who was able to do or notes to the whole group, and it is likely that none of his apostles never had anything not written during frey wille the three years that followed Jesus doing wonders?
I believe that the Gospel of Matthew is the first since he began writing it in our Lord Christ ministry. When about 38 years. apostles spread to the world, they surely had a small booklet, which they can share, and from which to preach. St.. Epiphanius says that St.. Matthew wrote his "a Jewish gospel" about 38 years (Haer, 51).
Matt probably made them the document in their native frey wille language - Aramaic. Later, when the Catholic frey wille Church has been expanded, the Greek version appeared in need. St.. St. Peter instructed to write. Mark's Gospel. St.. Athanasius frey wille says that Matthew wrote the gospel to Jewish Jerusalem and James of Jerusalem that it was translated into Greek, "Matthew's frey wille Gospel was written by Matthew in Hebrew dialect, released in Jerusalem, and the translation of James the Lord's brother" (Gospel synopsis).
By the way, St.. Jerome had access to the Gospel of Matthew and Jewish wrote to Pope Damasus, the Jewish Gospel of Matthew frey wille is different from the Greek of the Gospel of Matthew in the Jewish Jewish quoted the Old Testament and in the Greek - the Septuagint.
Exploring interesting Gospels are not the gospel of Mark and Q. The most interesting is the Aramaic Gospel frey wille of Matthew and the Gospel of Matthew Greek. Maybe ever discover the Aramaic version of the Gospel of Matthew. frey wille
kkk | 2012/02/03 11:02
Nelaikyčiau of Mr. Ph.D. opinion is very significant, because a lot of what was said by tradition from the ancient ages, and then suddenly found out that certain statements have no historical frey wille foundation. In addition, he writes: "This document was Christ speaking Q set, while many biblicist say that is one of Quelle and Logia (speaking Set) - is quite another. You better check with biblical scholars, rather than a PhD :)
This is what he criticizes such "Bible experts" :) His honest opinion, it is the former Anglican pastor went over to the Catholic faith and educated frey wille books. He has the right to have an opinion, and we reserve the right not to accept blindly everything experts say. In addition, he posted something scandalous here. I have a va near St.. Scripture contains a chronology, and it marked the same, that the Gospel of Matthew written in Aramaic, above, and Mark later Greek: Aramaic Matthew 50-60 m., And Mark 60-61 m. Thus, unlike Marshall says only